“People’s Constitution” to take down “Prayut regime” rejected by parliament

Parliament rejected a draft of the so-called “People’s Constitution,” a proposed legislation to take down what Thais call the “Prayut regime” and scrap the 20 12 months national strategy. A former Democrat candidate told Thai PBS World that “Prayut regime” basically allows the prime minister to control the Senate and other organisations mandated underneath the constitution.
Elusive ’s Constitution” draft was rejected by parliament yesterday, with 249 MPs and 224 senators voting against it, whereas 203 MPs and three senators voted in favour. But the secretary general of the Progressive Movement and a non-party reincarnation of the now-defunct Future Forward celebration, urged the common public to not lose hope.
Being a key proponent of the draft in addition to monarchy reform, Piyabutr Saengkanokkul from the Progressive Movement says he hopes that the opposition MPs who voted in favor of the draft will embody the constitution problem in their parties’ coverage platforms for the following election despite the actual fact that the present Constitution was written to make amending the country’s supreme regulation a difficult activity.
He urged fellow reformers to maintain preventing for true democracy and never to surrender their hope that the present Constitution might be altered in the future, added that each one attempts to vary the Constitution by the folks, as supplied by the constitution, have been obstructed and have didn’t pass even their first readings in parliament.
Piyabutr, along with Parit Wacharasindhu, a leader of the reformist group “Re-Solution”, appeared together in entrance of Parliament on Tuesday to defend the draft and pleaded members of the Thai parliament to be open-minded, claiming that the proposed laws is meant to dismantle the so-called “Prayut regime” that gives extra energy to PM Prayut Chan-o-cha and replace it with a fairer system that advantages all stakeholders.
Parit “Itim” Wacharasindhu, a big supporter of the People’s Constitution draft, expressed disappointment that the amendments draft was rejected outright by government MPs and senators.
He claims that the reformists’ proposal does not promote any drastic modifications to the present political construction and gained’t drawback any political actors, including that Parliament’s rejection was just one other try and “close the door” on any transfer to vary the current Constitution..

Leave a Comment