US granted permission to expand navy presence in the Philippines: What does it mean?

News the United States has been permitted by the Philippines to open 4 new military bases on the Southeastern Asian archipelago could have slipped beneath the radar of most mainstream media retailers however not this one. But what does it mean?
Philippines President Ferdinand Marcos immediately went on the defensive insisting that Manila is not going to enable “any offensive actions” from the bases it has opened to US troops, which often interprets that it will, in politician speak.
The places of the 4 army bases, on top of the 5 agreed on beneath the 2014 Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA), include Naval Base Camilo Osias in Santa Ana, Cagayan, Camp Melchor Dela Cruz in Gamu, Isabela, Balabac Island in Palawan, and Lal-lo Airport in Cagayan.
The alleged deal permits US troops to rotate through and retailer defence equipment and supplies.
Three of the new military bases are located close to Taiwan while the other faces the South China Sea.
China, understandably, accused the US of fanning the flames of struggle.
Marcos stated China’s response over the expanded navy deal was “not stunning,” however assured Beijing that the Philippines is only shoring up its territorial defence. Marcos said…
“We won’t allow our bases to be used for any offensive actions. This is only geared toward serving to the Philippines each time we want assist. If nobody is attacking us, they needn’t fear as a result of we will not struggle them.”
Warmongering US
Marcos appears to be suggesting the Philippines will come under attack from China, a bizarre suggestion given the mainland has by no means invaded one other nation in trendy historical past. Yes, it has had border skirmishes with India, and Vietnam and assisted Communist international locations within the Vietnam War and Korean War since the end of World War II but this pales into insignificance in comparability to the warmongering US.
A China Society for Human Rights Studies report reveals that from the tip of World War II to 2001, the US has “initiated 81% of armed conflicts in the world.”
From the tip of WWII in 1945 to 2001, stated the report, “Among the 248-armed conflicts that occurred in 153 regions of the world, 201 were initiated by the US, accounting for 81% of the total number.” That does not embrace the social, political and economic carnage brought on by US interference in Libya, Iraq, Syria, and Afghanistan.
The US can’t maintain its nostril out of other nations’ overseas affairs, and people self-anointed guardians of the galaxy attempting to “Make America Great Again” have been beating the drums of war in opposition to their next goal, China for many years, according to award-winning journalist John Pilger.
Their warmongering has been ramped as much as hysterical ranges over the previous few years using Taiwan as a flimsy excuse, ignoring the One-China coverage the US acknowledged in 1972.
Of course, the brand new navy bases within the Philippines will enable the US military to attack China faster on the premise that they looked at them humorous.

Civil and social unrest
China is not the only nation sad the US will once once more have a big military presence within the Philippines, after they had been told to go away in 1992 following a long time of civil and social unrest.
Co-President of the intelligence preparation of the battlefield (IPB) Corazon Valdez Fabros has been organizing towards US military presence in the Philippines for the explanation that Nineteen Seventies. She said…
“Imagine you’ve a visitor who comes into your home. You welcome this customer. But this may be a visitor who has all the guns, all of the supplies, that principally you can not object to because they’re fully loaded. And you can’t even tell this customer to get out of your house if you need them to get out.
“That is the US.”
US army presence within the Philippines has triggered deep concern amongst social movement leaders who oppose it. These leaders notice that US lawmakers seldom address how such navy growth within the Indo-Pacific region impacts countries like the Philippines, the place the US navy has already caused significant hurt, including sexual assault to baby abandonment.
This expansion in the Philippines is only one part of a larger effort by the US to build up its navy presence in an arc surrounding China. According to the Pentagon and the Overseas Base Realignment and Closure Coalition, there are no less than 313 US navy installations in East Asia and roughly 750 navy bases throughout the globe.
According to David Vine, a professor of anthropology at American University who has written extensively on US navy bases, China currently has one navy base in Djibouti and several other others within the South China Sea, bringing its total number of foreign navy bases to around eight.
China asserts that its sovereignty extends to the areas where these South China Sea bases are positioned, however The Hague’s Permanent Court of Arbitration has disputed this claim. As Skyrocket , this problem has triggered pressure between China and close by international locations just like the Philippines.
China-US tensions
Valdez Fabros, who serves as co-president of the anti-war IPB network, is nervous that any increase in the US navy presence may heighten the chance of struggle between the US and China. She said…
“This will not be one thing that for certain goes to happen. But the mere proven truth that the US is here makes it more doubtless one thing can happen. Maybe there’s a miscalculation. These things happen.
“Why can’t they do that training in their own country? That makes more sense. Of course, they’re doing it here to be aggressive. Were a scorching battle to erupt the US navy presence guarantees the Philippines can be dragged into it.
Roland Simbulan, a professor of developmental research and public administration on the University of the Philippines and creator of The Bases of Our Insecurity, a examine of US military bases in the Philippines, shares this worry. He said…
“The greatest hazard is the fact that the US presence in the Philippines will put us in danger of potential attacks on our territory and different people in case there is a warfare between China and US forces. We are the primary line of defence within the US technique.”
For Renato Reyes Jr., secretary-general of Bayan, the US presence itself inflicts harm, no matter whether or not it results in war. He said…
“It violates our sovereignty. It’s a clear sign that we are not really free.”
US army problems within the Philippines
The Philippines was beneath US colonial rule from 1898 to 1946, during which time the US military enforced its control and brutally repressed anti-colonial rebellions. The US waged a violent campaign towards the independence movement from 1899 to 1902, burning down whole villages and inflicting the deaths of as a lot as 20,000 Filipinos in combat, in addition to many as 200,000 civilians from hunger, disease, and war-related violence. Despite the Philippines profitable independence, the US maintained two giant bases in the country, which it used as a launching pad for navy interventions within the area, such because the suppression of the Boxer Rebellion, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War.
The Philippines lastly ousted the US army in 1992 after a robust anti-bases’ movement.
In an April three assertion, the Department of Defense tried to put a constructive spin on the native impacts of the rising US presence, claiming that infrastructure investments would enhance financial growth and job opportunities. However, activists are involved that when the US beforehand employed tens of thousands of Filipinos at Clark and Subic Bay bases, these employees faced exploitation and wage discrimination, as the US claimed it could override Philippine labour law. The inequality between Filipino and US civilian workers on bases led to labour organizing and main strikes.
Valdez Fabros, co-president of the anti-war IPB network, is troubled that the US is expanding its army presence within the Philippines without addressing its previous environmental harms. In a 1992 report to Senate leadership, the US General Accounting Office acknowledged its environmental destruction in the Philippines.
Both Clark Air Base and Subic Bay Naval Facility within the Philippines have contaminated websites and amenities that do not meet US environmental standards. For example, heavy metals from the ship repair facility at Subic Bay drain immediately into the bay or are buried in the landfill, and the power plant at the identical location has unknown quantities of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), that are possible human carcinogens.
Living close to US navy base places within the Philippines has been related to a better incidence of well being issues like most cancers, leukaemia, heart circumstances, and miscarriages.
Given this, Valdez Fabros just isn’t solely concerned concerning the environmental influence of the brand new US navy places she mentioned, “The US customer brings danger. We don’t want any part in a war.”

Leave a Comment